Dr. Michal Perlman

Professor, University of Toronto and Director, Dr. R.G.N. Laidlaw Research Centre, University of Toronto


Curriculum vitae



416-978-0596


Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE)

University of Toronto

252 Bloor Street West
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
M5S 1V6


Examining the psychometric properties of the infant-toddler environment rating scale-revised edition in a high-stakes context.


Journal article


Bisceglia R., Perlman M., Schaack D., J. Jenkins
Early Childhood Research Quarterly,, vol. 24(2), 2009, pp. 121-132


View PDF
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Bisceglia, R., Perlman, M., Schaack, D., & Jenkins, J. (2009). Examining the psychometric properties of the infant-toddler environment rating scale-revised edition in a high-stakes context. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.02.001


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Bisceglia, R., M. Perlman, D. Schaack, and J. Jenkins. “Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Infant-Toddler Environment Rating Scale-Revised Edition in a High-Stakes Context.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, no. 2 (2009): 121–132.


MLA   Click to copy
Bisceglia, R., et al. “Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Infant-Toddler Environment Rating Scale-Revised Edition in a High-Stakes Context.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 2, 2009, pp. 121–32, doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.02.001.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{bisceglia2009a,
  title = {Examining the psychometric properties of the infant-toddler environment rating scale-revised edition in a high-stakes context.},
  year = {2009},
  issue = {2},
  journal = {Early Childhood Research Quarterly,},
  pages = {121-132},
  volume = {24},
  doi = {10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.02.001},
  author = {Bisceglia, R. and Perlman, M. and Schaack, D. and Jenkins, J.}
}

Abstract

The psychometric properties of the Infant–Toddler Environment Rating Scale-Revised Edition (ITERS-R) were examined using 153 classrooms from child-care centers where resources were tied to center performance. An exploratory factor analysis revealed that the scale measures one global aspect of quality. To decrease redundancy, subsets of items were selected randomly and by experts who rated items according to ease of administration and importance to quality. The shorter subsets demonstrated good discriminant validity, adequate to good psychometric properties, and high associations to the full ITERS-R score. They also demonstrated similar associations to staff education and staff-to-child ratio, as the full instrument. The best assessment of quality was demonstrated by the shortened subset that included items that assess both structural and process features of quality. Multilevel-analyses indicated that classrooms from the same providers score more similarly on ITERS-R than classrooms from other providers. The implications for using the ITERS-R in high-stakes contexts are discussed.



Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in